<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy Features in Firefox 3.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnath.com/2009/07/07/privacy-features-in-firefox-3-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2009/07/07/privacy-features-in-firefox-3-5/</link>
	<description>johnath in blog form</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:15:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2009/07/07/privacy-features-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-214152</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/?p=335#comment-214152</guid>
		<description>Hi, I know it&#039;s probably not the best place to write, but could you please update MitM Me (SSL Error Bypass), so it canwork on firefox 3.5?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I know it&#8217;s probably not the best place to write, but could you please update MitM Me (SSL Error Bypass), so it canwork on firefox 3.5?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian M</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2009/07/07/privacy-features-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-214108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/?p=335#comment-214108</guid>
		<description>Yes, the &quot;forget about this site&quot; option and the clear recent data options are very good (I&#039;m particular fond of the former), but the private browsing mode is currently a non-starter compared to how it&#039;s done in Google Chrome.

If you&#039;ve got 30 tabs open, they all vanish whilst you&#039;re in private mode. That&#039;s just a completely unworkable solution. The visual difference in branding in Chrome when you&#039;re in private mode is also pretty important, especially for less technical users.

It&#039;s a good step, and the &quot;forget about this site&quot; is better than what&#039;s in Chrome, but the private mode is needs significant improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the &#8220;forget about this site&#8221; option and the clear recent data options are very good (I&#8217;m particular fond of the former), but the private browsing mode is currently a non-starter compared to how it&#8217;s done in Google Chrome.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got 30 tabs open, they all vanish whilst you&#8217;re in private mode. That&#8217;s just a completely unworkable solution. The visual difference in branding in Chrome when you&#8217;re in private mode is also pretty important, especially for less technical users.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good step, and the &#8220;forget about this site&#8221; is better than what&#8217;s in Chrome, but the private mode is needs significant improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
