Comments on: Updated SSL Certificate Database http://blog.johnath.com/2009/03/25/updated-ssl-certificate-database/ johnath in blog form Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:11:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rudavina http://blog.johnath.com/2009/03/25/updated-ssl-certificate-database/comment-page-1/#comment-213955 Rudavina Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:47:53 +0000 http://blog.johnath.com/?p=302#comment-213955 Интересные доводы. Надо попробовать Интересные доводы. Надо попробовать

]]> By: Eddy Nigg http://blog.johnath.com/2009/03/25/updated-ssl-certificate-database/comment-page-1/#comment-213949 Eddy Nigg Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:15:43 +0000 http://blog.johnath.com/?p=302#comment-213949 Converting to a MySQL DB and some good keys would perhaps improve search a lot. If you have any intention to run a conversion to MySQL please let us know. Also should you want some suggestions on that feel free to ping me. Thanks! Converting to a MySQL DB and some good keys would perhaps improve search a lot. If you have any intention to run a conversion to MySQL please let us know. Also should you want some suggestions on that feel free to ping me. Thanks!

]]> By: Dave http://blog.johnath.com/2009/03/25/updated-ssl-certificate-database/comment-page-1/#comment-213908 Dave Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:39:47 +0000 http://blog.johnath.com/?p=302#comment-213908 Sorry, forgot to add: Compressing them with tar+gzip rather than zip alone would probably be a considerable win due to the ability to exploit redundancy between certs. I'm not sure what bzip2 would give you since I don't think the BWT would be too good with many short redundant strings interspersed with lots of non-redundant data. Sorry, forgot to add: Compressing them with tar+gzip rather than zip alone would probably be a considerable win due to the ability to exploit redundancy between certs. I’m not sure what bzip2 would give you since I don’t think the BWT would be too good with many short redundant strings interspersed with lots of non-redundant data.

]]> By: Dave http://blog.johnath.com/2009/03/25/updated-ssl-certificate-database/comment-page-1/#comment-213907 Dave Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:12:18 +0000 http://blog.johnath.com/?p=302#comment-213907 Interesting! Any chance of getting them as flat files with (say) ten thousand per directory (the last time I processed cert files 100K at a time on a system with NTFS the amount of disk thrashing was... disturbing). This would make it easier to run a script over the certs without having to set up SQLite and extracting each one in turn. Interesting! Any chance of getting them as flat files with (say) ten thousand per directory (the last time I processed cert files 100K at a time on a system with NTFS the amount of disk thrashing was… disturbing). This would make it easier to run a script over the certs without having to set up SQLite and extracting each one in turn.

]]> By: Iang http://blog.johnath.com/2009/03/25/updated-ssl-certificate-database/comment-page-1/#comment-213899 Iang Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:38:28 +0000 http://blog.johnath.com/?p=302#comment-213899 Nice work! I'm not sure if this is even possible, but something that would be useful would be some statistics on client-cert login sites, and also the confusing question of how many of them are configured correctly. (Hmm.. I wonder if it is possible to test client-cert login .. without a client cert?) Nice work! I’m not sure if this is even possible, but something that would be useful would be some statistics on client-cert login sites, and also the confusing question of how many of them are configured correctly.

(Hmm.. I wonder if it is possible to test client-cert login .. without a client cert?)

]]>