<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSL Infoquickie (with Bonus Firefox Pro-Tip!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnath.com/2008/10/21/ssl-infoquickie-with-bonus-firefox-pro-tip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2008/10/21/ssl-infoquickie-with-bonus-firefox-pro-tip/</link>
	<description>johnath in blog form</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmdesp</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2008/10/21/ssl-infoquickie-with-bonus-firefox-pro-tip/comment-page-1/#comment-211306</link>
		<dc:creator>jmdesp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/?p=170#comment-211306</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to get such a statistic, but I think that most of the problematic sites will not be top 500.

Using a self-signed cert is something that a lot of small sites would do, but almost no large size sites. But as they are a lot of small sized sites doing it, they probably end up representing a larger number of viewed pages than a few of the top 500 site (that&#039;s the &quot;long tail&quot; magic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to get such a statistic, but I think that most of the problematic sites will not be top 500.</p>
<p>Using a self-signed cert is something that a lot of small sites would do, but almost no large size sites. But as they are a lot of small sized sites doing it, they probably end up representing a larger number of viewed pages than a few of the top 500 site (that&#8217;s the &#8220;long tail&#8221; magic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2008/10/21/ssl-infoquickie-with-bonus-firefox-pro-tip/comment-page-1/#comment-211305</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/?p=170#comment-211305</guid>
		<description>Any idea of EV adoption?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea of EV adoption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacopo</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2008/10/21/ssl-infoquickie-with-bonus-firefox-pro-tip/comment-page-1/#comment-211303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/?p=170#comment-211303</guid>
		<description>Another Firefox tip: there&#039;s an extension called Perspectives
 that &quot;verifies&quot; self-signed certs. The university servers access the site from various hosts in the world and verifying that the certificate is consistent over a period of time. While not the &quot;Perfect Solution&quot;, it does protect you from some man-in-the-middle attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Firefox tip: there&#8217;s an extension called Perspectives<br />
 that &#8220;verifies&#8221; self-signed certs. The university servers access the site from various hosts in the world and verifying that the certificate is consistent over a period of time. While not the &#8220;Perfect Solution&#8221;, it does protect you from some man-in-the-middle attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

