<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RRSP First Principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/</link>
	<description>johnath in blog form</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interest-Bearing</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/comment-page-1/#comment-83184</link>
		<dc:creator>Interest-Bearing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/index.php/2006/02/07/rrsp-wtf-2/#comment-83184</guid>
		<description>Glad to see someone is staying on top of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see someone is staying on top of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/index.php/2006/02/07/rrsp-wtf-2/#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>I would simply like to say thanks for the posting of this blog! I&#039;m 24 years old and have found myself in a position where I no longer have the excuse &quot;I don&#039;t make enough to invest in the future&quot;, and also have been frustrated about hearing how others have ultilized the RRSP tax system to reap excellent returns, whereas I have not. I found this to be an excellent high level overview above everything I&#039;ve read to date around this topic put in a way that easy to read and retain (and even somewhat entertaining) with an appropriate length as I can take this and investigate specifcs from it furthur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would simply like to say thanks for the posting of this blog! I&#8217;m 24 years old and have found myself in a position where I no longer have the excuse &#8220;I don&#8217;t make enough to invest in the future&#8221;, and also have been frustrated about hearing how others have ultilized the RRSP tax system to reap excellent returns, whereas I have not. I found this to be an excellent high level overview above everything I&#8217;ve read to date around this topic put in a way that easy to read and retain (and even somewhat entertaining) with an appropriate length as I can take this and investigate specifcs from it furthur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/index.php/2006/02/07/rrsp-wtf-2/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Ephraim - you&#039;re right that the withholding can be thought of just like an employer&#039;s front end tax and it is a mis-statement to imply that there are additional fiscal penalties charged. There is, however, an additional downside to making early withdrawals in that you don&#039;t get the contribution room back after doing so.  A lot of people who make this move are in relatively dire straits too, and should be aware that when their RRSP balance says $10k, that doesn&#039;t mean they can have $10k tomorrow if they cash out.  As you say though - as a deliberate and thoughtful supplement to a low income year the &quot;penalties&quot; are no more than you should rightly expect them to be in terms of tax on income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ephraim &#8211; you&#8217;re right that the withholding can be thought of just like an employer&#8217;s front end tax and it is a mis-statement to imply that there are additional fiscal penalties charged. There is, however, an additional downside to making early withdrawals in that you don&#8217;t get the contribution room back after doing so.  A lot of people who make this move are in relatively dire straits too, and should be aware that when their RRSP balance says $10k, that doesn&#8217;t mean they can have $10k tomorrow if they cash out.  As you say though &#8211; as a deliberate and thoughtful supplement to a low income year the &#8220;penalties&#8221; are no more than you should rightly expect them to be in terms of tax on income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephraim</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephraim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/index.php/2006/02/07/rrsp-wtf-2/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about the &quot;penalty&quot; that you refer to about withdrawing money from an RRSP before age 69.  I can&#039;t seem to find any documentation on this.  Taxes on the income, yes.  Penalty, no.

I have found that the government will &quot;withhold&quot; a certain amount of tax on RRSP withdrawals, the amount depending on the amount withdrawn (see http://www.theglobeandmail.com/series/rrsp/2005/neat.html for details).  But that&#039;s just them doing the same as any employer, grabbing the government&#039;s tax cut early.  You then end up having to pay the balance of the taxes.

So, in a lean year, if you&#039;re not making any money, you can take money out of your RRSP at will, but you&#039;ll have to pay taxes on it when you withdraw.  If you&#039;ve got evidence to the contrary, I&#039;d love to read it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about the &#8220;penalty&#8221; that you refer to about withdrawing money from an RRSP before age 69.  I can&#8217;t seem to find any documentation on this.  Taxes on the income, yes.  Penalty, no.</p>
<p>I have found that the government will &#8220;withhold&#8221; a certain amount of tax on RRSP withdrawals, the amount depending on the amount withdrawn (see <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/series/rrsp/2005/neat.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/series/rrsp/2005/neat.html</a> for details).  But that&#8217;s just them doing the same as any employer, grabbing the government&#8217;s tax cut early.  You then end up having to pay the balance of the taxes.</p>
<p>So, in a lean year, if you&#8217;re not making any money, you can take money out of your RRSP at will, but you&#8217;ll have to pay taxes on it when you withdraw.  If you&#8217;ve got evidence to the contrary, I&#8217;d love to read it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/index.php/2006/02/07/rrsp-wtf-2/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Indeed - your money is working sooner and the balance looks like it&#039;s going up faster too.  I always struggle when I write articles like this, because there&#039;s all sorts of good information to get out there, but I already write longer than most blog posts and the greater risk I think is people getting tired before they reach the bottom.  I hope that if there are readers out there who decide to get cracking on their RRSPs as a result of articles like this, that they might stumble onto these little optimizations on the way, but short of breaking out a separate &quot;21 interesting RRSP factoids&quot; article, which might indeed be a good one to write, my attempt to keep the word count down won out over mentioning items like this.

Which is why I am grateful to have you mention them in the comments, where others might read them and not blame me.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed &#8211; your money is working sooner and the balance looks like it&#8217;s going up faster too.  I always struggle when I write articles like this, because there&#8217;s all sorts of good information to get out there, but I already write longer than most blog posts and the greater risk I think is people getting tired before they reach the bottom.  I hope that if there are readers out there who decide to get cracking on their RRSPs as a result of articles like this, that they might stumble onto these little optimizations on the way, but short of breaking out a separate &#8220;21 interesting RRSP factoids&#8221; article, which might indeed be a good one to write, my attempt to keep the word count down won out over mentioning items like this.</p>
<p>Which is why I am grateful to have you mention them in the comments, where others might read them and not blame me.  <img src='http://blog.johnath.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axiom_1</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnath.com/2006/02/17/rrsp-wtf-2/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Axiom_1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnath.com/index.php/2006/02/07/rrsp-wtf-2/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>You know that if you plan your RRSP contributions in advance, there&#039;s a little form you can give to your employer that says &quot;I&#039;m going to deposit X into my RRSP, so you just go ahead and take Y amount less off my paycheck as tax, thank-you-very-much.  That way, rather than paying tax and then getting it back, you can just not pay it in the first place.  That way, instead of investing $2600 in year 1, you can invest the $800 tax return you would have made on that, plus the $200 tax return you would have made on that, the $50 you would have made on that, etc., up to say $3500, and still only take home a total of $2600 less on your paychecks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that if you plan your RRSP contributions in advance, there&#8217;s a little form you can give to your employer that says &#8220;I&#8217;m going to deposit X into my RRSP, so you just go ahead and take Y amount less off my paycheck as tax, thank-you-very-much.  That way, rather than paying tax and then getting it back, you can just not pay it in the first place.  That way, instead of investing $2600 in year 1, you can invest the $800 tax return you would have made on that, plus the $200 tax return you would have made on that, the $50 you would have made on that, etc., up to say $3500, and still only take home a total of $2600 less on your paychecks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

